GET 15% OFF TODAY ON YOUR FIRST ORDER

Sample Papers

NHS FPX 4000 Assessment 2 Attempt 1 Applying Research Skills

Capella University
Get Your Work Done With 0% plagrism ready to submit for
$150 - $50

Medication Errors

The medical services issue recognized as medication errors. Medication error is an error in the solution, apportioning, and organization of a medication, regardless of whether errors lead to unfriendly results (Dirik et al., 2019). My advantage in the point depends on my nursing calling, where I have seen various medication errors among patients. I have noticed suppliers endorse medications that patients are oversensitive to or even can hurt their prosperity over the long haul.

As a nurse, I should guarantee my patient wellbeing is considered at each stage no matter what the contention or conviction different doctors, drug specialists, or nurses have in their line of obligation. My experience has instructed me that defying medication errors goes on forever well, and I have noticed passing in the crisis office. I have had my involvement in unfortunate medication remedy, which put my patient in a state of extreme lethargy for seven days. The doctor had recommended Morphine to a five-year-old kid who had experienced padped bones because of a fall. The doctor determined the necessary sum briskly and advised me to give it to the patient. Following, the patient started having heart difficulties, and measures were taken to balance out the patient, however they were purposeless.

Peer-reviewed Articles for Medication Error

The models I utilized in looking for the four articles to examine the clinical issue depended on a fundamental assessment of existing peer-reviewed papers in EBSCOhost and the Capella Online Library. The expectation was to distinguish the watchwords utilized about the clinical subject. I recognized five watchwords to utilize: medication errors, medication compromise, patient security, emergency clinic, and unfavorable medication occasions.

at that point, set out on a consideration rejection measure enveloped peer-reviewed diaries with open-source ideas distributed inside the most recent four years in nursing, clinical, and logical research diaries and had the watchwords referenced previously. The papers should have likewise been distributed in English.

The prohibition was peer-reviewed diaries that were master and non-quantitative or subjective in view of a deliberate survey, meta-examination, and companion studies. The pertinence of the peer-reviewed articles depended on believability, and which implies arrangement with the subject of a medication error, dependability in view of the power of the writers, and legitimacy in light of the distribution date post-2017.

NURS PFX 4000 Assessment 2 Applying Research Skills

Annotated Bibliography

Alqenae, F. A., Steinke, D., and Keers, R. N. (2020). Pervasiveness and nature of medication errors and medication-related hurt the accompanying release from clinic to local area settings: an orderly survey. Drug security, 43(6), 517-537.

The review is expected to fundamentally assess accessible proof in regards to the pervasiveness and nature of medication errors and medication-related hurt following emergency clinic release. The foundation of the review depends on the inspiration to comprehend the study of disease transmission of medication errors and medication-related hurt during the progress from auxiliary to essential consideration.

The review assessed distributed contextual investigations from 1990 to 2019 across ten electronic data sets. There was no limitation in the assessment cycle. The review evaluated 54 investigations that confirmed that the medication error rates were essentially as high as 53%, with the greater part of the examinations concurring that there is over half of occurrences of medication errors. Different investigations noticed that antagonistic medication response rates were basically as high as 27%, while for pediatric patients, medication errors were just about as high as 66.3%, with unfriendly medication occasions as low as 9%. The article’s reasoning is to give information in regards to medication errors and unfavorable medication occasions.

Eslami, K., Aletayeb, F., Aletayeb, S. M. H., Kouti, L., and Hardani, A. K. (2019). Recognizing medication errors in neonatal escalated care units: a two-focus study. BMC Pediatrics, 19(1), 1-7.

The review’s goal was to evaluate the sorts and recurrence of medication errors in the NICU. The strategy utilized in the review was cross-sectional to assess two neonatal serious consideration units of two medical clinics more than 90 days. The review assessed segment information, drugs, and the quantity of solutions for every child in view of clinical records. The review’s outcomes including 688 solutions for 44 kinds of medications noticed that around 509 medication errors were somewhat high for every patient. This actually meant that there were 74.8% of medication errors with the distinguishing proof that doctors gave wrong measurements and the organization of wrong medications by nurses during the organization stage. The article offers quantitative information in regards to medication error events and their effects. The article’s reasoning is to give focuses to contention in regards to at what stage medication errors are given.

Insanities, E., Kusljic, S., and Wu, A. (2020). An orderly survey of mediations to lessen medication errors in grown-up clinical and careful settings. Restorative advances in drug security, 11, 2042098620968309.

The review’s goal was to assess medication error that happened during medication the executives cycles and why it is a huge reason for death. The research is a precise survey utilizing trustworthy diaries to assess the discoveries of the mediation in lessening medication errors among grown-ups in intense clinical and careful settings. A sum of 34 articles were reviewed under meta-investigation. 

The report showed that medication compromise under prepared coaches and mechanized doctor request passage is the best mediation. The utilization of the two methodologies can assist with decreasing medication errors. The review reasoned that solitary and consolidated mediation types were the best in lessening medication errors which policymakers should think about in clinical and careful settings. The article’s effect is to give medication error definition, events, and what it means for patients and clinicians. The article will offer advantageous contentions in regards to the clinical issue, particularly with the mediations and how they can assist with alleviating it.

Márquez-Hernández, V. V., Fuentes-Colmenero, A. L., Cañadas-Núñez, F., Di Muzio, M., Giannetta, N., and Gutiérrez-Puertas, L. (2019). Factors connected with medication errors in the planning and organization of intravenous medication in the clinic climate. PloS one, 14(7), e0220001.

The paper’s goal was to examine medication errors by assessing the information, disposition, and ways of behaving in controlling intravenous medication close by investigating factors in an emergency clinic setting. The researchers integrated a cross-sectional investigation of 276 clinic based nursing experts who were utilized to assess two factors. The first was diverse variation and approval. Utilizing Cronbach alpha worth assessment and multivariate investigation, the review noted huge contrasts among information and disposition, showing that more incredible significant information corresponds to a more uplifting outlook. 

The review’s discoveries resolved that information obtaining and an uplifting outlook advance satisfactory way of behaving that influences medication error counteraction. The reasoning for including the concentrate above is to assist with producing motivations behind why medication errors are wild among the staff. This would assist with increasing the contention in regards to human error and how it very well may be tried not to utilize natural elements.

Summary

I have discovered that in fostering an annotated bibliography, I should be tenacious in deciding the best peer-reviewed articles in view of their money, pertinence, and legitimacy. The central matters I have learned are to guarantee I have catchphrases and decide the kind of research papers (quantitative or subjective) and diary data sets. The principal commitments of the sources are to upgrade information in regards to medication errors, antagonistic medication occasions, and what clinical staff means for the result of patient mischief.

NURS PFX 4000 Assessment 2 Applying Research Skills

References

Alqenae, F. A., Steinke, D., & Keers, R. N. (2020). Prevalence and nature of medication errors and medication-related harm the following discharge from hospital to community settings: a systematic review. Drug safety, 43(6), 517-537. 

Eslami, K., Aletayeb, F., Aletayeb, S. M. H., Kouti, L., & Hardani, A. K. (2019). Identifying medication errors in neonatal intensive care units: a two-center study. BMC Pediatrics, 19(1), 1-7. 

Manias, E., Kusljic, S., & Wu, A. (2020). A systematic review of interventions to reduce medication errors in adult medical and surgical settings. Therapeutic advances in drug safety, 11, 2042098620968309. 

Márquez-Hernández, V. V., Fuentes-Colmenero, A. L., Cañadas-Núñez, F., Di Muzio, M., Giannetta, N., & Gutiérrez-Puertas, L. (2019). Factors related to medication errors in the preparation and administration of intravenous medication in the hospital environment. PloS one, 14(7), e0220001.

Step-by-Step Guide: Applying Research Skills

Step 1: Understand the Assessment Requirements

  • Objective: Identify and analyze peer-reviewed articles related to medication errors.
  • Deliverable: Create an annotated bibliography with summaries and evaluations of four articles.
  • Focus Areas: Medication errors, patient safety, and evidence-based solutions.

Step 2: Define Your Research Keywords

  • Use terms like:
    • Medication errors
    • Patient safety
    • Adverse drug events
    • Evidence-based practice
    • Nursing interventions

Step 3: Use Capella Library and EBSCOhost

  • Log in to the Capella University Library.
  • Select Nursing/Health Sciences Databases.
  • Use advanced search options to narrow your results by publication year (e.g., post-2017), peer-reviewed journals, and English language.

Step 4: Evaluate Your Articles

  • Check for:
    • Credibility: Published in reputable journals.
    • Relevance: Aligned with medication errors and nursing.
    • Quantitative/Qualitative Data: Ensure a balance.

Step 5: Write the Annotated Bibliography

  • Structure for Each Article:
    • Citation (APA Format): Include title, authors, journal, and year.
    • Summary: Key findings and focus of the study.
    • Evaluation: Relevance to your topic, strengths, and limitations.
    • Reflection: How it relates to medication errors and your nursing practice.

Step-by-Step Guide to Capella Library and Other Databases

Using Capella Library

  1. Log in to the Capella University Portal.
  2. Navigate to the Nursing and Health Sciences Library.
  3. Select EBSCOhost under recommended databases.
  4. Enter keywords like medication errors and apply filters:
    • Date Range: Last 5 years.
    • Type: Peer-reviewed articles.
    • Language: English.

Using PubMed

  1. Visit PubMed.
  2. Search for keywords: adverse drug events, nursing interventions.
  3. Use advanced search to filter for free full-text articles.

Google Scholar Tips

  1. Go to Google Scholar.
  2. Use search terms with quotation marks for precise results (e.g., “medication errors in nursing”).
  3. Check for open-access articles or use Capella’s login to access restricted content.

Saving and Organizing Articles

  • Save articles as PDFs for easy reference.
  • Use tools like Zotero or Mendeley to organize citations.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

A: Peer-reviewed articles are scholarly papers reviewed by experts in the field to ensure quality and credibility before publication.

A: Start with the citation in APA style. Below that, provide a concise paragraph for the summary, evaluation, and reflection.

A: Use databases like PubMed, EBSCOhost, or the Capella Library. Filter results for peer-reviewed journals published in the last 5 years

  1. Using non-peer-reviewed sources.
  2. Skipping the evaluation/reflection portion.
  3. Forgetting APA citation rules.
Verification is needed to avoid bots.

    Verify Code (required)

    Please Fill The Following to Resume Reading

      Verify Code (required)

      Verification is needed to avoid bots.
      Verification is needed to avoid bots.

        Verify Code (required)

        Please Fill The Following to Resume Reading

          Verify Code (required)

          Verification is needed to avoid bots.

          You cannot copy content of this page

          Scroll to Top