Introduction
BHA FPX 4106 Assessment 3 Healthcare Information Review Proposal : The purpose of this proposal is to evaluate the standard of care given to female patients with breast cancer who are between the ages of 30 and 60. Improving the quality of patient care is essential, particularly for cancer patients who struggle with mental trauma, stress, anxiety, and uncertainty in addition to the physical effects of the disease (Mahapatra, Nayak, & Pati, 2016). The assessment of the radiation treatment and diagnostic imaging or biopsies that patients received will be the main focus of this proposal. We aim to find areas for improvement and raise the standard of patient care by comparing our office data with external departmental data and national averages.
Data Collection Plan
After standards are established, data collection begins, using national averages as our point of reference. Hospital admissions and oncology partners are among the external departments from which we will collect data. The gathered data, which focuses on age, gender, and specifics of cancer diagnosis, is essential to the applicability of our proposal (Alexandrou & Mentzas, 2019). Due to issues with data availability, it could take two to three weeks to collect thorough information. The evaluation of healthcare will then be facilitated and required actions will be informed by a comparison of our office data with data from outside sources.
Data Security Plan
Maintaining the security of patient data is crucial, which calls for adherence to HIPAA rules. The first steps include securing the Electronic Health Record (EHR) system and obtaining valid authorization for the use of PHI (Oachs & Watters, 2020B). The EHR system will be the only way to manage all patient data, and staff members will be warned not to discuss patient information through unsecure channels. To preserve patient confidentiality and HIPAA compliance, the IT department will completely erase any redundant patient data after the study.
Benchmarking Plan
Our benchmark data is in line with national standards thanks to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) data (AHRQ, n.d.). Even though our office sees fewer patients than the national average, it is still instructive to compare our data to these benchmarks. To ensure efficient benchmarking, we will specifically concentrate on radiation therapy and breast cancer diagnostics in the 30–60 age range.
BHA FPX 4106 assessment 3 Healthcare Information Review Proposal
Quality and Change Management Strategies
By pinpointing areas where our clinic differs from national standards, data analysis will promote improvements in patient care. To improve patient outcomes, prompt treatment implementation and diagnosis effectiveness will be evaluated. In order to ensure adherence to established standards, management and senior leadership will use the evaluated data to start the necessary changes in diagnosis methods, treatment plans, and patient education (Alexandrou & Mentzas, 2019).
Implementation
Implementing changes involves training employees on updated procedures and policies after data evaluation and approval. The length of the training varies from one to two weeks for small changes to a month for extensive restructuring, depending on the extent of the necessary adjustments. In order to guarantee seamless transitions and reduce mistakes that can jeopardize patient safety and satisfaction, supervisors will supervise staff training and implementation.
Conclusion
Patients with other diagnoses may benefit if this proposal is implemented successfully, as it should increase patient satisfaction and care quality for those with breast cancer. To guarantee organizational effectiveness and patient welfare, changes must be reviewed and implemented methodically. Our objective of improving the quality of patient care can be achieved by implementing changes gradually and addressing identified weaknesses. https://etutors.us/bha-fpx-4106-assessment-4/
References
- IHI stands for Institute for Healthcare Improvement. (2023). enhancement of healthcare quality. taken from the website https://www.ihi.org
- AHRQ stands for Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. (2022). carrying out PDSA cycles. taken from the website https://www.ahrq.gov
- CDC stands for Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2023). Techniques for lowering infections acquired in hospitals. taken from the website https://www.cdc.gov
- WHO stands for World Health Organization. (2023). Hand washing in medical environments. taken from the website https://www.who.int
- HBR stands for Harvard Business Review. (2023). overcoming healthcare’s reluctance to change. taken from the website https://hbr.org
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
Q1: What is a healthcare quality improvement initiative?
A QI initiative is a methodical strategy for tackling particular healthcare issues in order to enhance patient outcomes and operational effectiveness.
Q2: How is a QI initiative’s success determined?
Key performance indicators (KPIs) like infection rates, patient satisfaction ratings, and cost savings are used to gauge success.
Q3: Which QI approaches are most frequently used?
Lean, Six Sigma, and Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) are popular approaches.
Q4: What makes stakeholder participation crucial to QI?
Involving stakeholders guarantees initiative alignment, buy-in, and successful execution.
Q5: How can QI initiatives be supported by technology?
Technology increases the efficacy of QI initiatives by assisting with data collection, analysis, and process automation.
