Name
Capella University
NURS-FPX6202: Health Care Quality and Safety Measurement
Instructor Name
October 2024
Quality and Safety Gap Analysis
For over two decades sepsis, associated with extreme end-organ dysfunction, has been a major concern in medicine. It is a prime reason for admission to the Intensive Care Unit and accounts for one-third of all hospital deaths. Approximately 850,000 patients with sepsis are admitted through the emergency department each year (Wang et al., 2024). The CDC estimates that 87% of cases develop outside the hospital and so the emergency department plays an important role in early recognition. Because sepsis advances rapidly, it is critical to identify it early, begin to give fluids quickly, start broad-spectrum antibiotics, and adequately treat the source of the infection. If sepsis becomes septic shock, the mortality increases to 40% (Wang et al., 2024). However, timely care has always depended on emergency departments which have the responsibility of diagnosing sepsis, a task that is not easy because of the depth of the condition and the inability to diagnose it just by mere observation.
Newer research also underlines the need for better sepsis care and control (Neely et al., 2022). New approaches like the inclusion of early warning signs and the use of telemedicine to support early identification of sepsis are already under investigation. However, teletransmission by emergency care teams is still quite restrained.
Implication for Early Recognition and Treatment
Due to this, early recognition of sepsis is important in maximizing patients’ improvement and survival and minimizing mortality figures. EDs are critical for identifying sepsis because many patients present with conditions that warrant urgent care (Alabdaly et al., 2021). Fast detection and early use of fluids and broad-spectrum antibiotics help reduce the development of severe sepsis or septic shock. The use of EHR alerts and telemedicine heightens the likelihood of early identification of sepsis and management.
Systematic Approaches in Emergency Departments
To expand the existing knowledge on sepsis management, increasing the usability of systematic methods in EDs is necessary. Clinical protocols for the assessment of patients try to eliminate the variability in patient assessment thus reducing chances of missing out on the sepsis condition (Schorr et al., 2022). Training and enlightenment programs for medical professionals about current developments in sepsis care need to be availed. Providing knowledge and skills to the ED staff ensures that the sepsis identification is done correctly and in the shortest time. These systematic approaches have been confirmed in many recent studies Mostly on early identification of sepsis and management.
Technological Innovations in Sepsis Management
In recent years, there have been that can be used to manage sepsis). Real-time applications such as telemedicine have enabled remote consultations and decision making which enable faster initiation of the appropriate treatment (Dewsbury, 2019). HSR 101 Pre-hospital interventions like the transfer of data from the ambulance to the ED enhance the care cycle, thereby improving the utilities and efficiency. Research has suggested that these technologies can enhance the way patients are managed especially for quick identification and treatment of sepsis.
Ongoing Research and Future Directions
Strategies to improve early recognition and sepsis care are continually investigated in the present research. New studies show that the combination of utilizing ML algorithms with EHRs can enhance early detection rates. These algorithms use big data to look for early signals of sepsis that doctors can use to get an early warning (Schorr et al., 2022). Education and role play simulation for ED personnel can also act as refresher program for healthcare providers regarding best practice ad new technologies. This mixer holds the potential to improve sepsis care, augment the patient’s healing, and reduce the effect of this life-threatening condition.
Practice Changes
Indications of sepsis detected later mean a delay in treatment and, therefore, low-quality sepsis care (Dewsbury, 2019). The emergency department then formed a Quality Improvement (QI) team to deal with this to reduce the gap between the current sepsis care measures and the ideal results. For process improvement, the team used the PPlan-Study-Do-Act (PDSA) cycle and for prioritization, a gap analysis was conducted.
Developing Early Detection Systems
The focus was initially established to design a new system of priority called triage mechanism which comprises an early identification and warning system of potential sepsis cases (Fu et al., 2020). An approach for the identification of possible sepsis in the electronic patient chart was introduced in the form of a screening tool if certain indicators were to be detected. During triage, the check-in nurse asked questions that required a ‘yes’ or ‘no’ answer about their patient’s condition: hypotension, low pulse oximetry, altered mental state, fever, over 65, and a weak immune system (Jackson et al., 2023). If the number of “yes” was high enough, a sepsis alert was raised, and the staff began actions like assigning a physician, checking lactate level and blood culture, initiating fluids IV, and informing the pharmacy about the possibility of the need for antibiotics.
Meeting and Exceeding Benchmarks
The second was to go beyond the national average and offer the best sepsis care possible, founded on available evidence. Clinical staff, leadership, pharmacists, and phlebotomists were part of the team, which implemented the intervention (Weiss et al., 2020). Team members tracked the study data and Assistant Nurse Managers (ANM) directly observed triage nurses and audited the charts of sepsis patients. To investigate the amount of time taken between the identification of sepsis, sampling of lactate acids/ blood cultures, and the administration of fluids /antibiotics (Ackerman et al., 2021). It was during these times that the ED was compared to national averages to determine that the ED was lackluster in three areas. We did antibiotics and IV fluids after the patients presented and in approximately 3 hours, lactate levels were obtained P.
Taking Action
These areas indicated by the QI team contain valuable information that brought focus on enhancing its operations to afford quicker identification and management of sepsis (Ackerman et al., 2021). It is crucial to adopt these change practices concerning practice changes to enhance its ability to provide effective care for sepsis patients, as well as enhance the results of such patents to reflect national benchmarks.
Building a Culture of Quality and Safety in Sepsis Care
The Surviving Sepsis Campaign (SSC) Adult Guidelines represent valuable guidelines for all clinicians who manage adult sepsis or septic shock patients. They launched the hour-1 bundle to be sure listeners understood the severity of the condition (Ackerman et al., 2021). This bundle is intended to improve care quality and optimize results. In the case of patients with sepsis that is severe, the minutes that pass are crucial. Sepsis as well as septic shock refer to diseases whose diagnosis requires prompt recognition and initiating appropriate treatment (Dewsbury, 2019). The hour-1 bundle informs the healthcare providers to do blood cultures expeditiously, obtain lactic acid levels, initiate fluid resuscitation, and start broad-spectrum antibiotics, preferably within the first hour of identifying sepsis. By so doing, there is a marked enhancement of the quality of care.
Implementing the Screening Tool
We decided to use two hospitals to implement the sepsis screening tool. At each hospital, in-services with staff were provided and informatics nurses created an electronic screening questionnaire to supplement the electronic triage tool used in the current setting (Dewsbury, 2019). Pilot implementation with data collection occurred. The pilot was successful and demonstrated an increase in treatment according to benchmark standards. Lactic acids were taken within 30 min of sepsis suspicion, IV fluids were initiated and antibiotics were given in less time than before. I.V. (Alabdaly et al., 2021). fluids were started as soon as the patient was identified, while the antibiotic was commenced after a mean of two hours as compared to three hours earlier.
Positive Outcomes
Consequently, the mortality rate in these hospitals was reduced to sepsis by one-thirdImplementing these assumptions has enhanced the quality and security of sepsis treatment significantly, and this minimized the existing gap between the current process of treatment and the best practice (Wang et al., 2024). The pilot model has established that timely interventions, aligned with the SSC 2024 Guidelines and supported by appropriate training tools and applications, can enhance sepsis treatment. Adopting a culture of quality and safe healthcare
NURS FPX 6202 Assessment 2 Conclusion
The measures aiming to enhance the quality and safety of sepsis treatment must be considered major priorities for healthcare practitioners. The incorporation of systematic concepts, early technologies, and detector systems in emergency departments is vital in the management of sepsis (Alshahrani et al., 2021). A range of practices such as the one-hour bundle introduced by the Surviving Sepsis Campaign and the Targeted Educational programs have been shown to have reduced sepsis mortality. There is a great need for organizations to embrace cultures of improvement and enhance utilizes technology in the management of sepsis by timely and effective treatment.
NURS FPX 6202 Assessment 2 References
Ackerman, M. H., Ahrens, T., Kelly, J., & Pontillo, A. (2021). Sepsis. Critical Care Nursing Clinics of North America, 33(4), 407–418. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cnc.2021.08.003
Alshahrani, B., Sim, J., & Middleton, R. (2021). Nursing interventions for pressure injury prevention among critically ill patients: A systematic review. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 30(15-16), 2151–2168. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.15709
Alabdaly, A., Debono, D., Hinchcliff, R., & Hor, S. Y. (2021). Relationship between patient safety culture and patient experience in hospital settings: a scoping review protocol. BMJ Open, 11(5), e049873. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-049873
Dewsbury G. (2019). Use of information and communication technology in nursing services. British Journal of Community Nursing, 24(12), 604–607. https://doi.org/10.12968/bjcn.2019.24.12.604
Fu, L. H., Schwartz, J., Moy, A., Knaplund, C., Kang, M. J., Schnock, K. O., Garcia, J. P., Jia, H., Dykes, P. C., Cato, K., Albers, D., & Rossetti, S. C. (2020). Development and validation of early warning score system: A systematic literature review. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 105, 103410. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbi.2020.103410
Jackson, H., West, O., Austin, A., & Peal, K. (2023). Interventions to improve advanced practitioner work-related quality of life and patient satisfaction. Journal of the Advanced Practitioner In Oncology, 14(1), 49–53. https://doi.org/10.6004/jadpro.2023.14.1.4
Neely, J., Sampath, R., Kirkbride, G., Meeks, S. L., & Durham, M. L. (2022). Health care quality and safety in a correctional system: creating goals and performance measures for improvement. Journal of Correctional Health Care: The Official Journal of the National Commission on Correctional Health Care, 28(3), 141–147. https://doi.org/10.1089/jchc.20.07.0058
Schorr, C. A., Seckel, M. A., Papathanassoglou, E., & Kleinpell, R. (2022). Nursing implications of the updated 2021 surviving sepsis campaign guidelines. American journal of Critical Care: An Official Publication, American Association of Critical-Care Nurses, 31(4), 329–336. https://doi.org/10.4037/ajcc2022324
Weiss, S. L., Peters, M. J., Alhazzani, W., Agus, M. S. D., Flori, H. R., Inwald, D. P., Nadel, S., Schlapbach, L. J., Tasker, R. C., Argent, A. C., Brierley, J., Carcillo, J., Carrol, E. D., Carroll, C. L., Cheifetz, I. M., Choong, K., Cies, J. J., Cruz, A. T., De Luca, D., Deep, A., … Tissieres, P. (2020). Surviving sepsis campaign international guidelines for the management of septic shock and sepsis-associated organ dysfunction in children. Pediatric Critical Care Medicine: A Journal of the Society of Critical Care Medicine and the World Federation of Pediatric Intensive and Critical Care Societies, 21(2), e52–e106. https://doi.org/10.1097/PCC.0000000000002198
Wang, X., Rihari-Thomas, J., Bail, K., Bala, N., & Traynor, V. (2024). Care quality and safety in long-term aged care settings: A systematic review and narrative analysis of missed care measurements. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 10.1111/Jan. 16358. Advanced online publication. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.16358
