Name
Capella University
NURS-FPX8012: Nursing Technology and Health Care Information Systems
Prof. Name
September, 2024
Using Data to Make Evidence-Based Technology Recommendations
Slide 1: Good morning, everyone. My name is —. This presentation will give a strategic outlook on how we can use Leapfrog and Medicare Compare data in our improvement of patient safety and inform evidence-based technology decisions in the setting of our healthcare practice.
Slide 2: We will begin by reporting the current organization’s scores from Leapfrog and Medicare Compare in three key areas of patient safety that include infection control, medication safety, and surgical complications (Tai et al., 2023). These would lead us to pinpoint concrete strengths and areas of improvement, hence guiding our selection of technology from automated monitoring of hand hygiene to computerized provider order entry systems, and real-time analytics to track surgical site infections. Finally, we will apply evidence-based technologies that would improve our safety scores while keeping up with regulation compliance, moving toward better patient outcomes so our organization becomes a quality institution offering the very best healthcare services.
Leapfrog and Medicare Compare Scores of the Organization
Slide 3: The Springfield Health Center has an overall Leapfrog grade of “C” which reflects a commitment to patient safety at the same time indicating several areas that need improvements. Assessments of facility performance were based on three critical areas of patient safety: medication safety, infection control, and surgical safety. Springfield received a good score in medication safety (Azyabi et al., 2021). This was because of the effective use of a Computerized Provider Order Entry system. Studies have illustrated that CPOE plays a very crucial role in bringing down medication errors. Hence, there is an opportunity to improve the care of patients by using such an application. The infection control scores, however, were quite low as seen, and this tends to indicate a number of the problems faced in the management of hospital-acquired infections. Furthermore, the ratings for surgical safety were middle-of-the-road, and this tends to suggest there is a need to follow the regulations much more closely in the surgery sector to reduce post-operative complications.
The rating of Springfield Health Center on the Medicare Compare platform is 3 out of 5 for patient safety, which reflects acceptable performance in preventing adverse events and ensuring patient safety during a hospital stay. The score is reasonably competitive against similar healthcare providers, with sizeable opportunities for improvement, particularly in emergency department efficiency and chronic disease management. To ensure improvement of both Leapfrog and Medicare Compare scores, the hospital needs to focus on improving infection control (McCauley et al., 2021). The real-time infection surveillance systems, possibly by reducing HAIs by 15% over the next year, will improve the rankings of Leapfrog in terms of infection control. The strict observance of the surgical checklists will improve surgical safety, thus reducing post-operative complications by approximately 10% within six months. Finally, optimization of emergency department operations to reduce wait times for patients by 15% within three months would improve Medicare Compare scores and enhance chronic condition management and patient satisfaction.
In addition, Springfield Health Center can do staff training programs, focusing on infection control and prevention measures to prove to be well-performing on Leapfrog and Medicare Compare. Educating healthcare professionals on the latest evidence-based practices will create a culture of safety wherein care is well delivered for patients (Amaral et al., 2022). Indeed, such training programs facilitated the observance of more protocol adherence, meaning that infections went down and patients’ care improved. The hospital can further use data analytics to track patient outcomes in real-time, thereby responding promptly to safety concerns. Such a proactive stance not only indicates a quality improvement orientation but also adheres to the emerging trend of data-informed practice in healthcare settings. Using all these strategies will help Springfield improve its score in safety, which eventually means that the patients will trust and be satisfied.
Evidence-Based Implementation of Informatics
Slide 4: To achieve an advanced level of performance in Leapfrog and Medicare Compare scores, the facility needed an enhanced Clinical Decision Support System but with predictive analytics integration (Thomas et al., 2020). Healthcare providers will thus be able to make timely and informed decisions that contribute to the better reduction of errors while aiming at providing higher-quality care to patients. A well-designed CDSS can reduce prescription errors considerably, which is important to Oakwood since it strives to make safety contributions in areas such as infection control and surgery.
Predictive analytics will be applied in the facility to discover trends in patient data that allow for interventions early enough to prevent complications from occurring. Oakwood should implement real-time infection surveillance systems: monitoring of infection rates across the facility constantly (Mohiuddin, 2020). These systems will notify the health professionals of the increased risk of infections thereby ensuring that interventions to prevent outbreaks are undertaken. The surgical checklists in the CDSS will ensure that each step in the surgical process is strictly adhered to, thus minimizing the chances of complications and infections after surgery. This move will place Oakwood in a better position to attain better ratings on the Medicare Compare in terms of patient safety. Although Oakwood is graded at “B” by the Leapfrog, there are areas – improving infection control and emergency department efficiency – which will allow it to compete more aggressively with high-performing facilities, leading to better patient satisfaction and quality of care.
Slide 5: The need to train and engage the staff on implementation should also be placed in high priority by Oakwood Acute Care Facility in maximizing the benefits of the new technologies. “Train the healthcare providers on how to use the upgraded Clinical Decision Support System in a practical manner so that they could feel at ease and comfortable with its integration into the daily flows”. Regular training and hands-on workshops can equip staff to engage in predictive analytics in real-time for safety and quality improvement to foster a culture of the same (Paweł & Paweł, 2024). Moreover, greater acceptance and enthusiasm for the change as staff have got first-hand information and feedback that fine-tunes the system better.
Continued improvement requires monitoring and measurement of how well the adopted technologies have been implemented. Specific KPIs for patient safety, infection rates, and surgical outcomes should help measure the impact of CDSS and other informatics tools on Oakwood (Magedanz et al., 2024). Routine analysis of these metrics will allow the facility to identify trends, celebrate successes, and pinpoint areas needing more development. This ongoing evaluation not only ensures high-quality patient care but also allows Oakwood to tailor its strategies according to evolving evidence and best practices, leading to better outcomes in both Leapfrog and Medicare Compare scores.
Rationale of the Presentation Structure
Slide 6: The presentation is drawn to enable the executive-level audience with critical data and actionable recommendations in an impactful manner that emphasizes clarity and focus on organizational strategic aims. By making each slide a key performance metric, graphs, charts, and illustrations of trends and comparisons bring further meaning to essential messages. For instance, the slides on Leapfrog and Medicare Compare scores have transparent graphics representing our performance on dimensions of patient safety, so the executives understand where we stand compared with the benchmarks and their competitors (Azyabi et al., 2021). It is helpful not only for understanding but for also informed choice-making by pointing out areas of further improvement and what might be expected from the proposed implementations of new technologies.
Slide 7: Other evidence to support the recommendations given is scattered throughout the presentation to throw emphasis on the recommended measures and to show how urgently needed these measures are in filling up patient safety gaps. It is in this light, for instance, the study by Ting et al. (2021) explains that specific examples like the projected outcome of an integrated EHR system, and benefits derived from the training of staff would be cited as examples. This will directly address the interests of executives in improving quality and compliance and optimizing resources by providing hard data on how these implementations can improve medication safety and surgical outcomes. At the end of it all, the desired impact is motivating the audience to support these initiatives as an indispensable investment in the organization’s leadership in patient care excellence and operational efficiency. The primary strategic alignment that the leadership of the organization would ensure is with the executive priorities so that the message resonates and drives action toward the recommended changes.
NURS FPX 8012 Assessment 2 Conclusion
Slide 8: Advanced informatics is crucial to implement at Oakwood Acute Care Facility, enhancing patient safety and improving healthcare outcomes (Hengy et al., 2022). With an enhanced CDSS that incorporates predictive analytics, healthcare providers can participate in timely and informed decisions to reduce medical errors while raising the quality of care. This endeavor will not only improve the Leapfrog and Medicare Compare scores but also cultivate a culture of continuous improvement in safety. In the long run, this quality-based approach positions Oakwood as a leader in patient-centered care, creating great strides in operational efficiency and gains in patient satisfaction.
Slide 9:
NURS FPX 8012 Assessment 2 References
Amaral, C., Sequeira, C., Albacar, N., Coelho, J., Pinho, L. G., & Ferré, C. (2022). Patient safety training programs for health care professionals: A scoping review. Journal of Patient Safety, Publish Ahead of Print.https://journals.lww.com/journalpatientsafety/abstract/2023/01000/patient_safety_training_programs_for_health_care.8.aspx
Azyabi, A., Karwowski, W., & Davahli, M. R. (2021). Assessing patient safety culture in hospital settings. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(5), 2466.https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/5/2466
Hengy, M., Farooqui, S., Dimitrion, P., Fotouhi, A., & Daveluy, S. (2022). Leadership training in dermatology: A narrative review. International Journal of Dermatology, 62(1), 97–102.https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ijd.16510
Magedanz, L., Hiolanda, S., Dayani, G., & Fernandez, F. (2024). Clinical pharmacy key performance indicators for hospital inpatient setting: a systematic review. International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11096-024-01717-x
McCauley, L., Kirwan, M., & Matthews, A. (2021). The factors contributing to missed care and non-compliance in infection prevention and control practices of nurses: A scoping review. International Journal of Nursing Studies Advances, 3(3), 100039.https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666142X21000217?via%3Dihub
Mohiuddin, A. K. (2020). An extensive review of patient satisfaction with healthcare services in Bangladesh. Patient Experience Journal, 7(2), 59–71. https://pxjournal.org/journal/vol7/iss2/14/
Paweł, B, & Paweł, S. (2024). Analysis of the effectiveness of safety training methods. Sustainability (Basel), 16(7), 2732–2732. https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/7/2732
Tai, T. W. C., Mattie, A., Miller, S. M., & Yawson, R. M. (2023). An examination of Leapfrog safety measures and Magnet designation. Journal of Healthcare Risk Management. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jhrm.21533
Thomas Craig, K. J., McKillop, M. M., Huang, H. T., George, J., Punwani, E. S., & Rhee, K. B. (2020). U.S. hospital performance methodologies: a scoping review to identify opportunities for crossing the quality chasm. BMC Health Services Research, 20(1). https://bmchealthservres.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12913-020-05503-z
Ting, J., Garnett, A., & Donelle, L. (2021). Nursing education and training on electronic health record systems: An integrative review. Nurse Education in Practice, 55. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1471595321002043?via%3Dihub
