Name
Capella University
NURS-FPX8014: Leading Global Health Strategic Planning and Policy Development
Prof. Name
September, 2024
Leading Global Health Strategic Planning and Policy Development
Ideally, such leading global health strategic planning and policy development should provide comprehensive frameworks to deal with broad global health challenges through collaboration, targeted interventions, and sustainable policies. One crucial point here is that strategies are culturally sensitive and appropriately tailored to the needs of specific target populations. Thus, cultural sensitivity is important for global health issues as it often cuts across highly entrenched cultural practices and beliefs on issues such as infectious diseases or maternal health. With the involvement of local customs and leaders from within the community, policymakers will achieve much greater acceptance of interventions created to improve health outcomes. This approach also corresponds to broader goals that global health organizations, like the World Health Organization or United Nations, have set: enhancing community involvement and respect for cultural diversity within efforts to develop public health (Oliveira et al., 2021).
Rationale and Preparation for Culturally Sensitive Strategies and Policies
Implementing a global health strategy or policy always requires the rationale behind presenting culturally sensitive strategies and policies to provide effective, inclusive solutions to health challenges, such as communicable diseases, maternal health, or other health challenges associated with access to healthcare services, which are often interwoven with local customs, values, and belief systems (Shahzad et al., 2021). Cultural sensitivity in the interventions will be one aspect that will make these interventions relevant and culturally appropriate to the community. In many ways, this builds trust and cooperation. In preparation for a presentation on these strategies, research on specific cultural norms, language barriers, and societal structures of a target audience is very crucial. This understanding can go as far as involving traditional healthcare practices, religious beliefs, and hierarchies in social organizations that may affect the reception of health programs. Such preparation would ensure that the policies presented are not only scientifically correct but also sensitive to the social fabric of the community, which is something crucial for their success.
Areas for Improvement in Preparation
While thorough research and planning would guarantee culturally sensitive presentations, there are areas for improvement in preparation if another person has known something. An example could include deeper interfacing with local health specialists or cultural leaders who are more attuned to the felt needs and issues of the community (Sims et al., 2021). Such understanding can assist in sensitizing the barriers that might be presumptively present that which academic research can never hope to appreciate. Gathering real-time data on specific health outcomes and challenges faced by the population of a given place would help in making the presentation more relevant because policies would address issues more currently. A more profound knowledge of political structures and how they influence healthcare policies in the region may also help refine strategies for advocacy, making the presentation thereby deeper and more effective.
Advocating for sustainable resources and thoughtful policy development
Advocating for sustainable resources and thoughtful policy development is an avenue to long-term solutions to the problems militating against global health (Prosen et al., 2023). For example, in the case of addressing a global health challenge such as waterborne diseases, merely offering short-term relief like emergency water supplies is insufficient. Sustainable resource development- such as investing in infrastructure for clean water access and sanitation- can ensure that those conditions are met and give the affected populations the tools and systems to prevent further outbreaks. Policy development should be targeted both towards improving healthcare access and strengthening local governance structures. Education on hygiene and disease prevention should be a critical component of any policy aimed at combating cholera. These strategies would, in the short term, provide health benefits but lay a foundation for healthier, more resilient communities over time.
Building Audience Support with Evidence-Based Appeals
Creating buy-in from key stakeholders as well as the target audience requires evidence-based appeals (Yousef et al., 2021). Data that demonstrates a sustainable approach’s effectiveness, such as healthier outcomes or cost savings from long-term resource development, can improve the investment case in those areas. For example, research that clearly shows an area enjoying lower mortality rates has had its water and sanitation infrastructure improved will be understood at a more immediate level by a policymaker or donor. The appeal will also be made through the value and interest dimensions of the audience, such as economic growth, public health, or community resilience, which adds value to the suggested policies themselves. From this perspective, the case for sustainable resource initiatives, then, should be better framed to highlight not only the necessity in the moral dimension but also the feasibility and economic prudence to incur more commitment from decision-makers and community leaders.
Aligning Sustainable Resource Investment with Organizational Goals
Organizational missions often incorporate the aspect of enhancing public health and community resilience. Therefore, investment in sustainable resources and policy development will directly line up with the mission of most nongovernmental organizations as well as government initiatives seeking the betterment of public health and community resilience. An example would be the efforts of WHO or WaterAid in any way to help work toward lasting improvements in global health, which would therefore mean interventions directed at the root causes of health disparities (Abrash et al., 2021). Sustainable investments in clean water, education, and healthcare infrastructure directly support their missions to create environments where long-term health outcomes can improve. Investments like this not only address current health crises but also create vulnerabilities going forward that decrease. For communities, they become more resilient and less reliant on continued aid.
Evidence showing a long-term impact of the organization’s goals and is in line with investments in natural resources will go a long way to garner support from stakeholders and funders. For instance, evidence showing better changes in disease outbreak prevention, economic productivity, or stability of communities due to good infrastructure or healthy policies can be presented as sound reasons for additional investments. The second reason is that the sharing of case studies where such techniques have proven successful resonates very much with the core of many NGOs or government programs in solidifying cost-effective impactful solutions (Koehn, 2023). When relating sustainable development efforts to an organization’s mission, advocates can develop stronger buy-in from internal as well as external audiences, thereby fostering further collaboration and investment in these areas.
Reflection on Advocacy for Sustainable Resources and Policy Development
This course was very helpful, as the experience brought home the belief in preparation and the quality of the ability to articulate ideas well. It was rather challenging to drive the message with some immense complexity in a way that would reach such a widely diverse audience. While some members of that audience may not have been familiar with the subtleties of global health policies, the message compellingly emphasized the need for sustainable investments to ensure long-term benefits in health (Yakusheva et al., 2024). Yet, at times, simplifying technical terms and using an even more vivid example could have further enhanced understanding and appeal. More pictorial data, such as charts or infographics, could have been added to make the presentation more dynamic and memorable.
Tailoring the message is another point in which future advocacy efforts may improve. This is because the message can be a better fit for what the audience’s priorities are. This includes finding out what specific interests and concerns stakeholders have so that the presentation can directly address those points that could be potential questions or objections. Furthermore, the discussions within the advocacy process may be more interactive to allow the advocates to clear concerns and thus make a stronger case for investment in sustainable resources (Heck et al., 2022). These adjustments would perfect subsequent presentations; hence the message would strike deeper in the psyche and lead to greater support for policy development and resource allocation.
NURS FPX 8014 Assessment 3 Conclusion
This sensitive thinking in the advocacy for the use of sustainable sources and also the making of policies relating to health at the global level should consider evidence-based data with culturally sensitive communications. This assessment was underscored by the idea that the use of relevant evidence and alignment of policies with broader organizational goals was a crucial requirement by the audience. With these key lessons from this assessment, advocacy work is going to be very strategically directed, in making global health initiatives effective just, and sustainable (Gandra & da Silva, 2023). They will form the basis for continuing to evolve strategies based on feedback and results, allowing practitioners to influence really positive change in global health outcomes.
NURS FPX 8014 Assessment 3 References
Abrash, A., Marr, J., Cahillane, M. J., & Bush, K. (2021). Building community resilience to disasters: a review of interventions to improve and measure public health outcomes in the Northeastern United States. Sustainability, 13(21), 11699. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132111699
Gandra, E. C., & da Silva, K. L. (2023). Teaching strategies for health advocacy for undergraduate nursing students. Nursing Education Perspectives. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.nep.0000000000001085
Heck, L. O., Carrara, B. S., Mendes, I. A. C., & Arena, C. A. (2022). Nursing and advocacy in health: An integrative review. Nursing Ethics, 29(4), 1014–1034. https://doi.org/10.1177/09697330211062981
Koehn, L. (2023). A review of the provision of hearing healthcare through humanitarian efforts. Capstones & Scholarly Projects. https://digscholarship.unco.edu/capstones/115/
Oliveira, K. D., Freitas, R. J. M. de, Araújo, J. L. & Gomes, J. G. N. (2021). Nursing now and the role of nursing in the context of pandemic and current work. Revista Gaúcha de Enfermagem, 42. https://doi.org/10.1590/1983-1447.2021.20200120
Prosen, M., Rebeka L.,, & Ličen, S. (2023). Health professionals’ role in promoting health and environmental sustainability through sustainable food advocacy: A systematic literature review. Sustainability, 15(18), 13651–13651. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151813651
Shahzad, S., Ali, N., Younas, A., & Tayaben, J. L. (2021). Challenges and approaches to transcultural care: An integrative review of nurses’ and nursing students’ experiences. Journal of Professional Nursing, 37(6), 1119–1131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.profnurs.2021.10.001
Sims, S., Fletcher, S., Brearley, S., Ross, F., Manthorpe, J., & Harris, R. (2021). What does success look like for leaders of integrated health and social care systems? A realist review. International Journal of Integrated Care, 21(4). https://doi.org/10.5334/ijic.5936
Yousef, M., Rundle, S., & Dietrich, T. (2021). Advertising appeals effectiveness: A systematic literature review. Health Promotion International, 38(4). https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/daab204
Yakusheva, O., Lee, K. A., & Weiss, M. (2024). The nursing human capital value model. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 104890–104890. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2024.104890
