Name
Capella University
PSYC FPX 2900
Prof. Name
December, 2024
Personality Test
The personality test is an objective instrument that assesses typical patterns of perceiving, emotions, and behaviors in a personality (Bingham & Byrne, 2021). On a normal basis, it comes in the form of one or a sequence of questions or statements about some features of personality, for instance, how the person would be when faced with pressures, how he or she relates to other people, or even in coming into some decisions. They are often summarized into personality types or traits that would enable one to know his strengths, weaknesses, preferences, and tendencies (Shin et al., 2022). The known tests are as follows; Myers-Briggs Type Indicator, personality model that is Big Five personality traits includes openness, conscientiousness, extraversion, agreeableness, and neuroticism, and Enneagram. Lots of personality tests can provide people or offer opportunities for studying through the sphere of career, self-development, and interpersonal relationships, team building for people to meet themself and others rightfully and deeper.
Ways to Gather Data
It has to do with one of the fundamental techniques during research that yields first-hand information on the analysis, interpretation, and decision-making. This is a function of the research question, the type of data needed, and the nature of resources available for this work (Baranczuk, 2019). More often, the data is obtained through questionnaires where questions are asked to the respondents or it can be structured or unstructured. Structured surveys are designed to elicit quantitative information; thus, the answers are routinely amenable to statistical evaluation. They are open-ended questions and as such, they help in obtaining quantitative data; thereby providing the researchers with an insight into what participating subjects feel, and go through. They can be administered through the web, phones, face-to-face, or post. These surveys are suitable for the collection of large data from many people within a short time although with response bias to the data.
Another popular technique is Interviews are also most helpful in providing broader and considerably deeper insight into a research domain. The kind of interviews is known to fall under structured, semi-structured, or unstructured depending on the extent to which the researcher is likely to follow a list of questions (Baranczuk, 2019). The structuring of an interview entails a stated list of questions that the data gathering of an interview is thus so organized and therefore can be easily and quantitatively analyzed because the researcher would freehand topics and one got deep quality. There are also possibilities for, interviewing: Face-to-face interviews, Over a phone conversation, or Via a video conferencing facility, It becomes possible to research, ask probes, and clarify the conversation. They provide very good information, however, they are time-consuming and prone to interviewer bias in the sense that the attitude adopted by the researcher affects their answers.
Document and archival analysis are obtained from the process of acquiring secondary data from records documents and archives (Bingham and Byrne, 2021). This is often used in any historical study, as well as policy analysis or case-study work that does not normally involve the historical method of original research. It may be obtained from government reports, journal articles, newspaper articles, or records of companies either in electronic format or manually. It is much less invasive but rather quite useful and particularly useful for things like history, law, and business. However, the type and the quality of the data depend on the quality of the records that were used for their preparation.
They just sit down and discuss a particular issue in a group of people with someone coordinating the same. It can be very effective for percept-based methodologies including Perception & attitude or Reaction toward a certain product or service idea etc.
They are used especially for qualitative data collection because a respondent can look at other respondents’ comments and can also mention points that may not be developed during one-on-one interviews. Even though focus groups are of much relevance to social science research, at present most of them are applied in systematic market research to examine a new product or an advertising concept. However, their answer is not accomplished without subjecting it to group dynamics; as a result, this may lead to an influential few always dominating the entire group the findings (Shin, 2021). The last type of activity is case studies where one is initially allowed to focus on a certain case or a few cases more often in real life. Such as business, psychology, and social sciences case studies are used in detail and context throughout phenomena that perhaps can be seen as complicated. Interview and observation data coupled with data gathered from document analysis contribute to the case picture. They are very effective for a specific problem or event, but on the other hand, they are not useful for entire populations.
Results
The findings indicate that the results section of a research study is the part where the results are presented factually and methodically. As a rule, adhering to the specified methodology, this section of the report provides information obtained in the course of the study, primarily without the subsequent analysis (Larsen & Buss, 2018). The results section is more or less an attempt that is made to give a factual account of the findings of the research. Informed by the type of analysis and research being carried out, results may be compiled in tables, graphs, charts, or descriptions.
In quantitative research, the findings are normally presented in the form of quantitative indices such as mean scores, percentages, Standard Deviation, correlation, tests of significance asset test, Analysis of variance (ANOVA), etc. Such results are usually presented in the form of a table or chart for the sake of comparison, as well as for the facilitation of making comparisons to determine patterns, correlations, contrasts, etc., between the variables in question. For instance, in a given study where there is consideration of a newly developed drug from blood pressure readings, the materials section should present data that reveals a comparison between pre-treatment and post-treatment blood pressure and any significance that may be determined from paired t-tests. Considering the kind of effects which are to be established and how precisely they have to be measured as well as the probability with which a special effect can be ascribed to chance, measures of statistics have to be taken.
In the case of qualitative research, the results section is actually about what proves consequential and meaningful from the data (Lim, 2024). For example, in an exploratory study that aims at identifying factors that affect the satisfaction of employees quotes from the interview may include; Exploratory –upon extraction, they may bring out themes such as the emergence of issues to do with communication, work-family interface, and leadership. It does not use statistics but tries to give the richness of participants and put it into order which makes sense.
One important thing that should not be done is making any judgment where the conclusion and recommendations of the study are regarded as the latter part of the paper and the results section should contain no opinion made by the writer. Most often, interpretation or discussion of the results can be produced in the discussion section.
PSYC FPX 2900 assessment 3 Conclusion
Data collection, therefore becomes a part of the research where several procedures may be selected by the researcher on how the study nature is likely to be posed and what type of data needs to be acquired for the study (Baranczuk, 2019). These are through Questionnaires or Interviews, observation, Experimentation, and Case study among others. Each has its merits and demerits and therefore the best fitting choices have to be made in a bid to arrive at the answers to the individual questions. Results The section of a study offers facts and objective statements that can be associated with the data collected; in this case, it is a simple presentation of findings through structured statistics or thematic analysis.
PSYC FPX 2900 assessment 3 References
Bingham, N. J., & Byrne, H. (2021). Archival strategies for contemporary collecting in a world of big data: Challenges and opportunities with curating the UK web archive. Big Data & Society, 8(1), 205395172199040. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951721990409
Baranczuk, U. (2019). The Five-Factor Model of Personality and Emotion Regulation: A Meta-analysis. Personality and Individual Differences, 217-227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2018.11.025
Lim, W. M. (2024). What is qualitative research? An overview and guidelines. Australasian Marketing Journal (AMJ), 0(0). https://doi.org/10.1177/14413582241264619
Larsen, R., & Buss, D. (2018). Personality Psychology: Domains of Knowledge about Human Nature (6th ed.). McGraw-Hill.
Shin, S. Y. S. S. Y., & Miller, S. M. S. (2022). A review of the participant observation method in journalism: designing and reporting. Review of Communication Research, 10. https://www.rcommunicationr.org/index.php/rcr/article/view/12
Tett, R. P., Toich, M. J., & Ozkum, S. B. (2021). Trait activation theory: a review of the literature and applications to five lines of personality dynamics research. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 8(1), 199–233. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-012420-062228