Marjorie Honorat
Capella University
NURS-FPX8014: Global Population Health
Dr. Alexandra Duke
September 2024
Nongovernmental Agencies Involved in Global Issues
Nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) play very important roles in solving global health issues; these complement government-sponsored programs by providing a flexible, responsive approach (Nishimi & Street, 2020). The government, comparatively is relatively bound by policies, budgets, and bureaucratized structures, while NGOs are independent nonprofit organizations that can adapt rapidly to emerging health crises. Most NGOs operate in different countries, especially regions where support from the government is weak or insufficient. Essentially, NGOs rely on diverse funding mechanisms, both individual donations and grants, for their specific health interventions towards meeting specific needs among underprivileged populations. Because NGOs can focus on particular health-related problems, they are in a position to fill crucial gaps that mainstream global health efforts are unable to do, especially where government participation is limited. Fluctuating funding from donors and resource constraints could therefore hit NGOs hard, with far-reaching consequences on their long-term sustainability as well as reach. While its operations provide a vital entry point to answering broader health disparities and equity efforts on the global scene, the NGOS offers important possibilities to developing nations to attain sustainable solutions in achieving improved health status.
Difference Between Public Health NGO’s and Governmental Public Health Organizations
Public health NGOs contrast more sharply with governmental public health organizations: by structure, funding, and the scope of work (Basabih et al., 2022). Generally, NGOs are non-profit-making, independent organizations that do not report directly to any government. Nonetheless, government grants or contracts in support of a program can be sourced from the authorities. Funded basically from private donations, international organizations, and philanthropic institutions, the NGOs also serve the purpose of restoring public health order and promoting health education. This autonomy allows NGOs to be more flexible and responsive to health-related emergencies, which are also often focused on specific topics, like infectious disease, maternal health, or provision of access to clean water sources in underprivileged areas. Some examples of this type of organization include Médecins Sans Frontières (Doctors Without Borders), which provides medical treatment in regions with conflicts as well as epidemics; the Global Fund, which focuses on combating AIDS, tuberculosis, and malaria around the world.
On the other hand, a governmental public health organization is one, such as the CDC in the United States or the NHS in the U.K., operates and gets most of its funding from its respective government (Maciel et al., 2021). Their role is also often more extensive: they are often responsible for national surveillance of diseases, conducting policies, and giving health information. They are more bureaucratic in their operations and answerable to the government, hence slow in responding to emerging health concerns. Government organizations are usually characterized by bigger budgets and all the trimmings but are typically bound by political agendas, bureaucratic procedures, and budget constraints. NGOs on the other hand are easier to target health concerns and populations and are thus an essential counterpart in global efforts at health.
History of the International Diabetes Federation (IDF)
It reaches over 170 countries via its presence in more than 230 national diabetes associations. These countries cut across all areas all over the world, including Africa, Europe, North America, South America, Asia, and the Western Pacific. With the support of local health organizations and governments, the IDF assists in addressing regional diabetes issues and sets up evidence-based prevention and treatment efforts specific to each region (Hadwan Aldahmashi et al., 2024). The global reach of IDF makes it possible to promote improvements in diabetes care and to heighten awareness about the impact that the disease has on a population-wide basis.
To gain a broad outreach among various groups of the population, the IDF has amplified its enormous international network for diabetes awareness, education, and support. Being on the front lines, the federation develops stronger healthcare systems in developing nations and developed nations, focusing on challenges distinctly presented by each region. It works in low-income nations to improve access to required diabetes drugs and health care. The organization, therefore, contrasts this position with that of wealthier nations where lifestyle change and prevention of type 2 diabetes might be emphasized. This widespread presence enables the IDF to tailor its approach according to the requirements of the populations it caters to (Jyotsna et al., 2023).
Countries with IDF Presence
IDF works together with more than 170 different countries along with national diabetes associations in cooperation to handle the global crisis of diabetes. The countries work within four regions: Africa, Asia, Europe, and the Americas. The organization partners with local organizations in conducting region-specific strategies to build up ways of improving care and prevention in diverse communities globally.
Since the IDF is an international organization, it can work with the diverse issues that characterize the needs of different countries: exploring ways to access diabetes better in low-income nations and promoting prevention through publicizing promotion in more prosperous areas. Doing so will allow the IDF to promote effective, locally adapted interventions that respond to the diverse healthcare setting needs of the people dealing with diabetes.
Advantages of Public Health NGO’s over Government-Sponsored Programs
Public health NGOs often have marked advantages over government-initiated programs, especially in terms of flexibility and swift response. Government agencies are not free to act independently because bureaucratic procedures restrain them and cause delays in action (Rajabi et al., 2021). This allows NGOs to respond to new issues much more promptly, and they can be innovative in their approach. Even more, NGOs can immediately reach out to grassroots communities without having to avoid intermediaries, which makes their intervention accordingly culturally and regionally responsive. The ability of NGOs to work with other NGOs, private organizations, and other organizations globally could enhance resource mobilization, and international cooperation, and hence deepen effectiveness in tackling public health issues.
How Application for Assistance is Made
In public health NGOs, the fund is frequently disbursed strictly according to the mission pursued by the organization and in line with its strategic priorities as well as the needs of the communities being served (Von Gerich et al., 2021). Normally, funds are targeted towards different programs such as health education, medical supplies, prevention of disease, and infrastructural development. Most NGOs have a clear mechanism through which accountability is observed since most of them give a report back to their donors and stakeholders on how the funds are used. The distribution can be flexible, that is, it is likely to change based on the severity of the health situation, the needs of the region, and the urgency of the situation in the crisis. In disasters, monies are moved around to meet almost direct relief activities such as potable water, access to medical treatment, and food supplies. NGOs also tend to work together with local people to ensure that the money allocated is spent in ways that the needy reach it and that there is no delay or complication that might be evident in government schemes. Some NGOs may, in addition, allocate a certain percentage of funds for future use to ensure that the impact is long-term and post-health intervention.
How Funds Are Distributed
In most public health NGOs, funding allocation is usually based on the organization’s mission, strategic priority, and specific needs of the communities where the organizations operate. Funds allocated to programs include health education, medical supplies, disease prevention, and infrastructure development (Alves et al., 2020). Most NGOs are clear in their process for accountability, often reporting back to the donor and stakeholders on how these funds have been spent. The share, however, is distributed based on the need of the situation concerning the medical condition, the need of the area concerned, and the level of emergency. For instance, during emergencies, funds are siphoned off for immediate relief actions like the provision of water, medical care, and food distribution. NGOs also frequently partner with grassroots organizations in order not to experience delays or complications that sometimes accompany governmental programs, and thus ensure that the amounts get to the right people. Other NGOs also set aside a percentage for sustainability work to sustain impacts over long periods beyond immediate health interventions.
Challenges of Public Health NGO’s
Public health NGOs face a number of challenges that can make them less efficient than government-sponsored programs. Unstable funding is probably one of the most difficult problems since most NGOs rely on donors and grants, which are easily affected by economic shifts and changes in priorities by funders (Al Harthi et al., 2020). Instability makes the entire scenario hard for long-term planning and sustainability, such that the organizations have to change strategy oftentimes. Some other issues that NGOs may encounter are differences in government policies and regulations between countries, as different laws and policies sometimes make it complicated for NGOs to give effective help across borders.
On the other hand, government-led initiatives are bound to more consistently enjoy better funding and stable frameworks that can facilitate a holistic plan and implementation of public health interventions (Yao & Johanson, 2022). However, NGOs appear to enjoy greater flexibility and responsiveness to respond promptly to the crises facing public health. Though NGOs suffer from low resources and much bureaucratization, their grassroots structures and novel approaches can easily lead to impactful solutions supplementing the state’s efforts to address public health issues.
Sufficiency of Data
A magnitude of data sources determines whether or not to pursue a specific health issue for public health NGOs, both in terms of the seriousness of the problem and the effect of their intervention (Kidgell et al., 2020). It may be derived from a local health survey, an epidemiological study, and reports from governmental or international health organizations. With this data, NGOs could gauge the severity of health threats, clearly identify vulnerable populations, and work on prioritizing areas for their actions. However, the validity would be highly variable because it depends on the availability of statistics, and even on cultural and regional disparities in health conditions, which sometimes restrict the NGO from making appropriately informed decisions.
To design their engagement standards, most NGOs rely on various techniques like stakeholder engagement, community profiling, and pilots to obtain qualitative and quantitative inputs. Local community engagement enhances the NGO’s appreciation for the specific health concerns and cultural sensitivities that may influence the approach to intervention. This participative process also enriches the data gathered and builds mutual trust and cooperation between the NGO and the communities to be targeted. Indeed, ongoing refinements to the standards through new information and suggestions would continue to enable NGOs to support effectiveness in addressing critical health issues but remain attuned to the changing landscape of global health. challenges (Splitgerber et al., 2021).
Practicum Research and Interviewing Experiences
Through the practice research and interviews, it proved very enlightening to unravel some of the long-held perceptions concerning public health organizations. Before my experiences, I relied on the perceptions that public health organizations were just charity-based NGOs which are donation-dependent and volunteer-dependent initiatives; however what soon I realized was the need for strategic partnerships, information-driven decision-making, and the sustainability requirements for funding models (Tuomikoski et al., 2020). Last but not least, it established the fact that knowing both NGOs and government-sponsored programs was on top of what mattered in public health issues, thereby further emphasizing the fact that effective intervention required teamwork between so many sectors.
On reflection, I learned my lesson to look at public health challenges in a much more balanced approach in any future professional practice. I will learn how to collaborate with NGOs by understanding the operational frameworks and the criteria that guide them. Perhaps most importantly, realizing the need for data analysis and community involvement while informing health strategies will make me stay responsive to the particular needs of the populations I target to serve better, thus making my interventions effective and culturally sensitive (Dellafiore et al., 2022).
NURS FPX 8014 Assessment 1 Conclusion
In conclusion, there exists a complex world of global public health comprising a wide range of NGOs and programs that are government-funded-all greatly contributing in various capacities towards health initiatives around the world. Analysis of the structure and funding mechanisms of these organizations and the problems encountered will indicate that NGOs often possess unique advantages such as flexibility and community engagement which enables them to promptly respond and address local needs in health. The findings of the practicum research and interviews dispelled these old assumptions and emphasized collaboration and strategies based on data when it comes to health initiatives (Yoong et al., 2022). As I go about with my professional practice, I will be directing my efforts along with NGOs and governmental organizations in tackling pressing health challenges and thus leading to more effective and equitable health solutions worldwide.
NURS FPX 8014 Assessment 1 References
Alves, O. M. A., Moreira, J. P., & Santos, P. C. (2020). Developing community partnerships for primary healthcare: An integrative review on management challenges. International Journal of Healthcare Management, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/20479700.2020.1723882
Al Harthi, M., Al Thobaity, A., Al Ahmari, W., & Almalki, M. (2020). Challenges for nurses in disaster management: A scoping review. Risk Management and Healthcare Policy, 13(13), 2627–2634. https://doi.org/10.2147/rmhp.s279513
Basabih, M., Prasojo, E., & Rahayu, A. Y. S. (2022). Hospital services under public-private partnerships, outcomes and, challenges: A literature review. Journal of Public Health Research, 11(3), 227990362211157. https://doi.org/10.1177/22799036221115781
Dellafiore, F., Caruso, R., Cossu, M., Russo, S., Baroni, I., Barello, S., Vangone, I., Acampora, M., Conte, G., Magon, A., Stievano, A., & Arrigoni, C. (2022). The state of the evidence about the family and community nurse: a systematic review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(7), 4382. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19074382
Hadwan Aldahmashi, Maneze, D., Molloy, L., & Yenna Salamonson. (2024). Nurses’ adoption of diabetes clinical practice guidelines in primary care and the impacts on patient outcomes and safety: An integrative review. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 154, 104747–104747. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2024.104747
Jyotsna, F., Ahmed, A., Kumar, K., Kaur, P., Chaudhary, M. H., Kumar, S., Khan, E., Khanam, B., Shah, S. U., Varrassi, G., Khatri, M., Kumar, S., & Kakadiya, K. A. (2023). Exploring the complex connection between diabetes and cardiovascular disease: analyzing approaches to mitigate cardiovascular risk in patients with diabetes. Cureus, 15(8). https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.43882
Kidgell, D., Hills, D., Griffiths, D., & Endacott, R. (2020). Trade agreements and the risks for the nursing workforce, nursing practice, and public health: A scoping review. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 109, 103676. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2020.103676
Maciel, A. L. P., Braga, R. B. de S., Madalosso, G., & Padoveze, M. C. (2021). Nosocomial outbreaks: A review of governmental reporting systems. American Journal of Infection Control. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2021.11.011
Nishimi, K., & Street, N. W. (2020). Nursing education partnerships between western high-income universities and non-governmental agencies and low-income local agencies: A scoping review of the literature. Journal of Professional Nursing, 36(3), 147–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.profnurs.2019.08.010
Rajabi, M., Ebrahimi, P., & Aryankhesal, A. (2021). Collaboration between the government and nongovernmental organizations in providing health-care services: A systematic review of challenges. Journal of Education and Health Promotion, 10(242), 242. https://doi.org/10.4103/jehp.jehp_1312_20
Splitgerber, H., Davies, S., & Laker, S. (2021). Improving clinical experiences for nursing students in nursing homes: an integrative literature review. Nurse Education in Practice, 52(2), 103008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2021.103008
Tuomikoski, A.-M., Ruotsalainen, H., Mikkonen, K., & Kääriäinen, M. (2020). Nurses’ experiences of their competence at mentoring nursing students during clinical practice: A systematic review of qualitative studies. Nurse Education Today, 85(104258), 104258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2019.104258
Von Gerich, H., Moen, H., Block, L. J., Chu, C. H., DeForest, H., Hobensack, M., Michalowski, M., Mitchell, J., Nibber, R., Olalia, M. A., Pruinelli, L., Ronquillo, C. E., Topaz, M., & Peltonen, L.-M. (2021). Artificial intelligence -based technologies in nursing: A scoping literature review of the evidence. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 127(1), 104153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2021.104153
Yao, J., & Johanson, U. (2022). A review of government-led health and productivity management and disclosure practice in Japan. Frontiers in Sustainability, 3. https://doi.org/10.3389/frsus.2022.939316
Yoong, S. Q., Liao, A. W. X., Goh, S. H., & Zhang, H. (2022). Educational effects of community service-learning involving older adults in nursing education: An integrative review. Nurse Education Today, 113, 105376. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2022.105376
